Jesus of Nazareth

To avoid the evidence for the resurrection and its implications, skeptics have come up with several alternative hypotheses and theories to explain

Skeptics often accuse the Church of trying to manipulate the data surrounding the historical Jesus to better fit the narrative of his

There is an incredible amount of historical evidence for Jesus’ resurrection. In fact, one of the world’s leading scholars on the resurrection,

In order to avoid the evidence for the resurrection and its implications, skeptics have come up with several alternative hypotheses and theories

To avoid the evidence for the resurrection and its implications, skeptics have come up with several alternative hypotheses and theories to explain

In order to avoid the evidence for the resurrection and its implications, skeptics have come up with several alternative hypotheses and theories

“So comprehensive and pervasive is the resurrection of Jesus that, historically speaking, the onus is on the skeptic to overturn it.”[1] –

“So comprehensive and pervasive is the resurrection of Jesus that, historically speaking, the onus is on the skeptic to overturn it.”[1] –

“So comprehensive and pervasive is the resurrection of Jesus that, historically speaking, the onus is on the skeptic to overturn it.”[1] –